Steven J. Humburg

Badge #2874, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Criminal Intelligence Section since July 2021
Also served at 101st Precinct
Service started July 2008, made $188,000 last year, Tax #947090

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (4)
Abuse of Authority: Stop (3)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25903
Closed: 2/21/2024
Case: 2022-25906
Closed: 5/4/2023

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$150,000   Fowler-Washington, Ikeem vs City of New York, et al., 2019 EDNY EDNY 19CV06590
$40,000   Chavanne, Brian vs Palmer, Beverley, et al., 2014 QCSC QCSC 002951/2014
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
24 Allegations
9 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
6 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
3 Unfounded
6 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202302506, March 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202100314, January 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 6 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, November 6, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 6 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #201307725, August 2013
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201107013, May 2011
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202302506, March 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Female, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202100314, January 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Male Unfounded
Force: Physical force Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 6 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, November 6, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 6 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #201307725, August 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 29 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 29 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 29 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201107013, May 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 17 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 17 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 17 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 17 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25903
Closed: 2/21/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
  2. Wrongful entry of a premises.
  3. Wrongfully searched a vehicle.
  4. Wrongfully stopped an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (6 days)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2022-25906
Closed: 5/4/2023
Case Details:
  1. Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
  2. Failed to prepare required reports.
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits, $190,000 total settlements.

Wimms, Sonia vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 710334/2024, Supreme Court - Queens, May 31, 2024
Complaint
Description: On October 13, 2023, P.O. HUMBURG and JOHN or JANE DOE approached and falsely accused Plaintiff of criminal acts before illegally seizing Plaintiff without probable cause, reasonable suspicion, valid search or arrest, or any legal justification. P.O. HUMBURG and JOHN or JANE DOE continued to go through all of Plaintiff’s home, destroying her possessions and demanding she open her locked safe, under threat of being prosecuted, before giving Plaintiff’s home a mess. With P.O’s false information, a search warrant was issued. Then P.O. HUMBURG, and JOHN or JANE DOE arrested the Plaintiff without probable cause. P.O. HUMBURG and JOHN or JANE DOE possessed no valid reason to restrict Plaintiff’s movements, including ...

Fowler-Washington, Ikeem vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 19CV06540, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 2, 2019

Fowler-Washington, Ikeem vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 19CV06590, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 2, 2019, ended December 22, 2023
$150,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On December 16, 2017, plaintiff Ikeem Fowler-Washington was sleeping in home when defendant officers attacked him. The defendants hit plaintiff in his face with some object and struck plaintiff's body numerous times. Plaintiff bled and requested medical attention but was denied. Plaintiff was then transported to Jamaica Hospital so his injuries could be assessed and treated. The plaintiff received several stitches to close deep gashes on his face and was trasnported to a police precinct, however, the plaintiff continued to bleed profusely. Plaintiff was then transported to central booking where he was arraigned on several alleged false claims made by one or more of the defendants.

Chavanne, Brian vs Palmer, Beverley, et al.
Case # 002951/2014, Supreme Court - Queens, March 4, 2014, ended October 17, 2014
$40,000 Settlement