David J. Rodriguez

David J. Rodriguez

David J. Rodriguez
Badge #1680, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 62nd Precinct since July 2020
Service started July 2014, made $151,000 last year, Tax #957090

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Complaints

3 Complaints
16 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Exonerated
13 Unable to Determine
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202403375, April 2024
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Chinese Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Chinese Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Chinese Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Chinese Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Gesture
Complainant: Chinese Female, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Chinese Female, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Chinese Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Chinese Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Chinese Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Chinese Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Chinese Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Gesture
Complainant: Chinese Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Gesture
Complainant: Chinese Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202205902, September 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Asian Male, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201507554, September 2015
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202403375, April 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Chinese Female, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Offensive Language: Gender Chinese Female, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Chinese Female, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Offensive Language: Race Chinese Female, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Gesture Chinese Female, 18-20 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Chinese Female, 18-20 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Chinese Female, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Offensive Language: Gender Chinese Female, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Chinese Female, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Offensive Language: Gender Chinese Female, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Female, 15-17 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Chinese Female, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Gesture Chinese Female, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Gesture Chinese Female, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202205902, September 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Asian Male, 65-69 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201507554, September 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 37 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Fina, Vincent vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 504209/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, March 16, 2022, ended November 12, 2025
Administrative Closing
Complaint
Description: On February 13, 2019, at 4:30a.m., Plaintiff and his wife were asleep inside of their room at the Auburn Shelter when defendant officers, including OLIVER MUIR, DAVID RODRIGUEZ, PIERCE, MOLLEUR and other unknown police officers, burst into Plaintiff’s room with their firearms drawn and pointed at Plaintiff and his wife without warrant, probable cause or any legal justification. Plaintiff was then immediately handcuffed and placed under arrest. Plaintiff was informed he was being arrested for a robbery. No proceeds of any alleged robbery were found in Plaintiff’s possession or in the room where he was arrested. Plaintiff was maliciously prosecuted for a crime he did not commit whereas Defendants had the proof ...