Taroon P. Ramharakh

Taroon P. Ramharakh

Taroon P. Ramharakh
Badge #11597, Asian Male
Police Officer at 25th Precinct since October 2019
Service started July 2018, made $173,000 last year, Tax #966290

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Frisk

Complaints

6 Complaints
12 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
3 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202604142, April 2026
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202600108, December 2025
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202311104, November 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202301991, March 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sexual Miscon (Inappropriate Touching)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202200946, February 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201907538, August 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202604142, April 2026
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Complainant Unavailable
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Complainant Unavailable
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Hispanic Male, 25-29 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202600108, December 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202311104, November 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other Female, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202301991, March 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Sexual Miscon (Inappropriate Touching) Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202200946, February 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Female, 30-34 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201907538, August 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 26 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Bennett, Dajuan vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 156884/2025, Supreme Court - New York, June 2, 2025