Chaoli Kuang

Badge #6510, Asian Male
Former Police Officer at Transit Bureau District 32
Service started January 2005, ended April 2025, Tax #936890

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29081
Closed: 11/28/2023

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
7 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
4 Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202402274, March 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Immigration Status)
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
additional details

Complaint #202203837, May 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Age 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Complainant: Age 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Age 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202402274, March 2024
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Immigration Status) Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Discourtesy: Word Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Offensive Language: Other Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
additional details
Complaint #202203837, May 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Age 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Age 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Age 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29081
Closed: 11/28/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A