Jaime Sequeira

Jaime Sequeira

Jaime Sequeira
Badge #15649, Hispanic Male
Former Police Officer at 30th Precinct
Service started September 2000, ended September 2021, Tax #927505

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2020-22496
Closed: 8/20/2020

View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Alleged Victim Unavailable
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201702623, March 2017
Allegation: Offensive Language: Sexual orientation
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200807225, May 2008
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #200603891, March 2006
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200412075, December 2004
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200408384, August 2004
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 62
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201702623, March 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Sexual orientation Male Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200807225, May 2008
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #200603891, March 2006
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200412075, December 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 39 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200408384, August 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 62 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2020-22496
Closed: 8/20/2020
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Failed to make proper notifications.
  2. Guilty: Failed to conduct an investigation.
  3. Guilty: Failed to prepare required reports.
  4. Guilty: Failed to make required entries in Department logs
  5. Guilty: Made misleading or inaccurate statements during an official Department interview.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), vacation days (60 days)


Other Documents