Aleksandr Chekalin

Aleksandr Chekalin

Aleksandr Chekalin
Badge #17067, White Male
Police Officer at 60th Precinct since September 2024
Also served at 73rd Precinct, Field Training Unit
Service started October 2018, made $158,000 last year, Tax #966501

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property

Lawsuit Settlements:
$975,000   Hepburn, Oswald vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 EDNY EDNY 21CV04158
$17,500   Charlemagne, Kenyarta vs City of New York, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 515110/2020
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
14 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Uncooperative
3 Exonerated
2 SRAD Closure
1 Unfounded
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202603299, April 2026
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202406182, June 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Formalized Training)
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Departure Letter
additional details

Complaint #202406100, June 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202207645, November 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: White Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202100030, December 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202603299, April 2026
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 40-44 SRAD Closure
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 40-44 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202406182, June 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Female, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Hispanic Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Female, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation Hispanic Female, 40-44 Unfounded
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Formalized Training)
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Departure Letter
additional details
Complaint #202406100, June 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons Black Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202207645, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop White Female, 21-24 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202100030, December 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 25-29 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 25-29 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 25-29 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 5 known lawsuits, $992,500 total settlements.

Maisonet, Desmond vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 503119/2025, Supreme Court - Kings, April 10, 2025

B., O. an Infant By His M/n/g Hind, Chriette vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 504712/2025, Supreme Court - Kings, February 13, 2025

Hepburn, Oswald vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 21CV04158, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, July 29, 2021, ended November 26, 2025
$975,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On May 2, 2020, Plaintiff Oswald Hepburn was standing outside his sister's residence when NYPD officers were called to a nearby location to disperse a crowd. After Plaintiff's sister complained about the treatment of people in the crowd within earshot of NYPD officers from her doorway, Defendant Officers Lt. Bobo, Sgt. Musa, PO Aponte, and John Doe 1-4 rushed towards the home. Plaintiff was standing outside, and Lt. Bobo immediately grabbed him. Lt. Bobo, Sgt. Musa, PO Aponte, PO Chekalin, and John Doe 1-4 then forcefully threw Plaintiff on the ground, and then Sgt. Musa tased Plaintiff on the neck. Officers kept Plaintiff's arms pinned behind his back and brutally assaulted him. In an attempt to dissuade the o...

Hudson, Marlon vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 523017/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, December 10, 2020
Complaint
Description: On December 27, 2019, at approximately 7:00 p.m., Marlon Hudson was lawfully walking home near East 98th Street and Lenox Road in Brooklyn, New York, when he was falsely detained and arrested by officers from the 73rd precinct. The officers accused Hudson of trespassing in a building he had not entered, pointed their firearms at him, struck him, and handcuffed him in a manner that caused unnecessary pain. Hudson did not resist arrest and was searched illegally without any cause. He was transported to the 73rd precinct, where he was searched again, and no illegal contraband was found. Hudson was detained until December 28, 2019, and later transported to Central Booking in Kings County, where he was held under i...

Charlemagne, Kenyarta vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 515110/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, August 28, 2020, ended October 7, 2021
$17,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 7th, 2020, Defendant Police Officers Aleksandr Chekalin, Richard Liguoir, and John Doe No. 1 arrested Kenyarta Charlemagne without probable cause in front of his residence in Brooklyn. After inquiring about the ownership of a vehicle parked in front of the house belonging to one of Charlemagne's friends, the officers arrested Charlemagne without probable cause and held him in police custody for two days. Officers repeatedly misidentified Charlemagne as another man, Darius Cole, who was wanted for sexual offenses, although they had Charlemagne's driver license as proof of his identity.