Nory A. Mitchell

Nory A. Mitchell

Nory A. Mitchell
Badge #13159, Black Female
Police Officer at 81st Precinct since October 2020, active
Service started July 2019, made $71,800 last year, Tax #968011

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26455
Closed: 7/25/2022

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$50,000   Mapp, Iesha vs City of New York, et al., 2021 EDNY EDNY 21CV05535
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
9 Allegations
4 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
3 Unfounded

Complaint #202201316, March 2022
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202107626, December 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202101053, January 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Age 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Age 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Age 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202201316, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 15-17 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 15-17 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202107626, December 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Hispanic Female, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Hispanic Female, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Female, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation Hispanic Female, 55-59 Unable to Determine
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202101053, January 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Age 45-49 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Age 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Age 45-49 Unfounded
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26455
Closed: 7/25/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully searched an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Mapp, Iesha vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 21CV05535, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 28, 2021, ended May 25, 2022
$50,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 8, 2020, Plaintiff was arrested for a string of burglaries that occurred in Kings County, New York between January 27 and June 17, 2020. There were a number of differences between Plaintiff and the suspect who had been caught on camera on multiple occasions. These differences included a limp, different facial features, age gap, weight difference, different hair, and clothing style. Plaintiff informed NYPD Detective Daal that she was not the person in the video, but he arrested her regardless. Plaintiff’s arm was dislocated during her arrest while she was in handcuffs. The arm did not heal for months after the arrest. Plaintiff had to spend 15 days at Rikers Island until she was able to make bail. All ch...

Other Documents