Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Jorge Lealenriquez
Badge #23574,
Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 26th Precinct since January 2019
Service
started July 2017,
made $174,000 last year,
Tax #964111
Complaints
2
Complaints
6
Allegations
2
Substantiated
2
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1
Unable to Determine
2
Unfounded
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202505881,
June 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Other |
| Complainant: | Female, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Other |
| Complainant: | Female, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #202309894,
October 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Penalty: | Formalized Training |
| Complaint #202505881, June 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop | Black Female, 25-29 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Other | Female, 25-29 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Other | Female, 25-29 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202309894, October 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Male, 35-39 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Male, 35-39 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 35-39 | Unable to Determine |
| Penalty: Formalized Training | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2021-24271
Closed: 6/29/2022
Case Details:
- Pleaded Guilty: Failed to comply with driving rules and regulations.
- Pleaded Guilty: Theft of time
Penalty: Forfeiture of time/leave balances, vacation days (35 days)