Mary E. Vecchio

Badge #1641, White Female
Former Police Officer at Midtown South Precinct
Service started January 2016, ended January 2023, Tax #961411

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26170
Closed: 7/23/2022

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
3 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complainant Uncooperative

Complaint #202003031, April 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Asian Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Asian Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201902919, March 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202003031, April 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Asian Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Asian Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201902919, March 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Female, 37 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26170
Closed: 7/23/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongful entry of a premises.
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Shaw, Walter A., et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 20CV02952, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, September 15, 2020
Complaint
Description: On January 27, 2020, Plaintiffs were dining in a restaurant when Plaintiff Mr. Shaw was falsely arrested without probable cause after NYPD Officers attributed the report of a fourteen year old boy who had indicated that a man wearing a red scarf had approached him in the men's room at the restaurant and touched his buttocks to Plaintiff Mr. Shaw. Defendants coerced the victim to identify Plaintiff Mr. Shaw as the perpetrator and brought Plaintiff to the police station. Defendants did not conduct any investigation such as viewing surveillance tapes, talking to witness, or surveying other patrons for a red scarf. Plaintiff was charged on January 28, 2018. Despite allegations from the victim that he "felt somethin...

Other Documents

DA Disclosure Letter
Employment History Summary