Vernon W. Miller

Badge #24974, Black Male
Police Officer at 42nd Precinct since August 2022, active
Also served at 44th Precinct, 73rd Precinct
Service started December 1997, made $137,000 last year, Tax #920611

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2020-22168
Closed: 11/20/2020
Case: 2019-20754
Closed: 11/25/2019
Case: 2012-8240
Closed: 12/18/2014
Case: 2013-10994
Closed: 12/18/2014

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complaint Withdrawn
3 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202205052, July 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #200910700, July 2009
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200508944, August 2005
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Complainant: Black Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202205052, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 35-39 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #200910700, July 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Female, 46 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200508944, August 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 45 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 45 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Black Male, 45 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2020-22168
Closed: 11/20/2020
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Said Police Officer violated personnel rules.
  2. Pleaded Guilty: Said Police Officer violated Department of motor vehicles rules.
Penalty: Vacation days (18 days)

Case: 2019-20754
Closed: 11/25/2019
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Said Police Officer failed to prepare a complaint report.
  2. Pleaded Guilty: Said Police Officer failed to conduct an investigation.
  3. Pleaded Guilty: Said Police Officer wrongfully arrested an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: Vacation days (18 days)

Case: 2012-8240
Opened: 10/2/2012
Closed: 12/18/2014
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Appeared at the Bronx traffic court on fourteen (14) separate occasions and did give inaccurate sworn testimony regarding seventeen (17) summonses issued
  2. Guilty: Failed to appear in traffic court with his Department issued activity log and/or his copies of the pertinent summonses on approximately eighteen (18) occasions while present to offer his testimony
  3. Guilty: Failed to accurately record activities to his activity log
  4. Guilty: Was in possession of an unregistered handgun
  5. Guilty: Failed to safeguard a firearm
  6. Guilty: Having changed his residence, failed to notify his Commanding Officer by submitting form change of name, residence or social condition, as required
  7. Guilty: Did enter remain inside the Bronx county New York state supreme court building unrelated to his assigned duties and outside the scope of his official capacity as a Police Officer
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgment is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year. Forfeiture of thirty (30) days served on pre-trial suspension and thirty (30) vacation days.

Case: 2013-10994
Opened: 2/3/2014
Closed: 12/18/2014
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While in Bronx traffic court, did fail to possess the relevant activity log for date of occurrence and the officer's summons copy, resulting in the dismissal of the summons
  2. Guilty: While in Bronx traffic court, did fail to possess the relevant activity log for date of occurrence and the officer's summons copy, resulting in the dismissal of the summons
  3. Guilty: While in Bronx traffic court, did fail to possess the relevant activity log for date of occurrence and the officer's summons copy, resulting in the dismissal of the summons
  4. Guilty: Having changed his residence, did fail to notify his Commanding Officer by submitting form change of name, residence, or social condition, as required
  5. Guilty: Did fail to safeguard his activity log
Penalty: See Case #2012-8240 for penalty