Jonathan M. Meo

Jonathan M. Meo

Jonathan M. Meo
Badge #23103, Black Male
Police Officer at Community Affairs Bureau Community Outreach Division since July 2026
Service started October 2016, made $165,000 last year, Tax #962611

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal) (2)
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual/Romantic Proposition) (2)

Complaints

2 Complaints
7 Allegations
4 Substantiated
4 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded

Complaint #202302750, March 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal)
Complainant: Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device
Complainant: Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal)
Complainant: Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual/Romantic Proposition)
Complainant: Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual/Romantic Proposition)
Complainant: Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202202067, March 2022
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202302750, March 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal) Female, 21-24 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device Female, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal) Female, 21-24 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Female, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual/Romantic Proposition) Female, 21-24 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual/Romantic Proposition) Female, 21-24 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202202067, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Male, 45-49 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Bethea, Asia vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 521632/2024, Supreme Court - Kings, August 13, 2024
Complaint
Description: On August 11, 2023, Plaintiff was lawfully and properly present on the premises where she was unlawfully detained and assaulted by Defendant Officers Monelli, Leo and John Does 1-5. Plaintiff did not possess a weapon of any kind during the incident. Plaintiff was seriously and permanently injured. The detainment and physical force of the Plaintiff was not justified by probable cause or other legal privilege.