Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Joseph P. Doyle
Badge #14277,
White Male
Police Officer at 106th Precinct Detective Squad since September 2025
Also served at
60th Precinct
Service
started July 2014,
made $162,000 last year,
Tax #956611
Complaints
4
Complaints
8
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3
Exonerated
1
SRAD Closure
1
Unable to Determine
2
Unfounded
Complaint #202507657,
July 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 70-74 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
Complaint #202306036,
June 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
Complaint #202105334,
September 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Force: Handcuffs too tight |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #201800850,
October 2017
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 72 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Complaint #202507657, July 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property | Male, 70-74 | SRAD Closure |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202306036, June 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 25-29 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202105334, September 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Female, 50-54 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital | Black Female, 50-54 | Unable to Determine |
| Force: Handcuffs too tight | Black Female, 50-54 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201800850, October 2017 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Exonerated | |
| Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises | Exonerated | |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property | Black Female, 72 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusions.