Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $30,000 total settlements.
Zabala, Jeremy vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 722433/2023,
Supreme Court - Queens, October 26, 2023, ended August 25, 2025
$30,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On August 19 2022, the Plaintiff was approached by John Does on his front step followed by the arrival of 4 police cars. Without any explanation he was arrested and transported to the 102nd Precinct and held in a cell for 4 hours. He was threatened with the possibility of arrest when faced with accusations and allegations by NYPD Detective Michael Klein and John Does. Plaintiff was not arraigned until August 20 2022 and released from Rikers on August 22 2022. Detective Klein initiated a malicious prosecution against the Plaintiff. The case was dismissed on January 10 2023.
Patania, Giovannino, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 158521/2012,
Supreme Court - New York, December 14, 2012, ended April 17, 2019
Zero Disposition