Richard P. Moore

Richard P. Moore

Richard P. Moore
Badge #26107, White Male, 37
Police Officer at 61st Precinct since January 2011, active
Service started July 2008, made $108,000 last year, Tax #947811

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2020-22054
Closed: 5/15/2020

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$60,000   Abdukhamitova, Makhbuba vs City of New York, et al., 2016 EDNY EDNY 16CV04909
$435,000   Pilipenko, Liliya, et al. as Adm of The Estate of Volchkin, Denis (deceased ) vs City of New York, et al., 2015 EDNY EDNY 15CV06053
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Complaint Withdrawn
3 Exonerated

Complaint #202101602, March 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: White Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: White Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201810315, December 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: White Female, 48
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Charges and Specifications - Guilty
Penalty: Vacation: 4 days / Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201805915, July 2018
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: White Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: White Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202101602, March 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Female, 45-49 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Action White Female, 45-49 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording White Female, 45-49 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201810315, December 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card White Female, 48 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Charges and Specifications - Guilty
Penalty: Vacation: 4 days / Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201805915, July 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action White Male, 32 Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number White Male, 32 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2020-22054
Closed: 5/15/2020
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Failed to provide business card.
  2. Guilty: Improper use of body-worn camera.
Penalty: Training, vacation days (4 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $495,000 total settlements.

Abdukhamitova, Makhbuba vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV04909, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, September 2, 2016, ended October 9, 2018
$60,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On September 3, 2015, while plaintiff and his son was standing outside an apartment building, police arrived at the location in response to a call. Defendants arrested plaintiff's son.

Pilipenko, Liliya, et al. as Adm of The Estate of Volchkin, Denis (deceased ) vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV06053, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 23, 2015, ended July 5, 2017
$435,000 Settlement
Complaint, Amended Complaint
Description: Defendant Officers responded to Plaintiff's 911 call that her son had become violent and had locked her out of the house. Defendant officers searched the home, couldn't find him, and left without contacting anyone else. The son returned hours later and Defendant officers returned to the home in response to another call and were made aware that the son was armed and dangerous inside. Without calling for ESU or following protocol, officers entered the home and shot and killed the son.

Other Documents