Christian J. Lopez
Badge #2750,
Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 9th Precinct since May 2021
Service
started November 2020,
made $83,700 last year,
Tax #969911
Complaints
3
Complaints
4
Allegations
0
Substantiated
2
Closed - Pending Litigation
1
OMB PEG Directive Closure
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202507943,
August 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Female, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | White Female, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #202406106,
June 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | OMB PEG Directive Closure |
Complaint #202309417,
October 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Cuban Female, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Complaint #202507943, August 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | White Female, 25-29 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Force: Physical force | White Female, 25-29 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202406106, June 2024 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Male, 35-39 | OMB PEG Directive Closure |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202309417, October 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital | Cuban Female, 35-39 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.