Substantiated Allegations:
Discourtesy: Word (2)
Discourtesy: Word (2)
John J. Sammartino
Badge #28540,
White Male
Police Officer at 110th Precinct since October 2020
Service
started January 2019,
made $173,000 last year,
Tax #967321
Lawsuit Settlements:
$20,000 Ortiz, Luis Alberto Cefla vs City of New York, et al., 2023 QCSC QCSC 706322/2023
View Details
$20,000 Ortiz, Luis Alberto Cefla vs City of New York, et al., 2023 QCSC QCSC 706322/2023
View Details
Complaints
3
Complaints
13
Allegations
2
Substantiated
2
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2
Complaint Withdrawn
4
Unable to Determine
2
Unfounded
3
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202300884,
January 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Chokehold |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Age 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Gesture) |
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Age 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Age 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Age 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Age 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Penalty: | Command Discipline - A |
Complaint #202201992,
March 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202201430,
February 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Other |
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
| Complaint #202300884, January 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Chokehold | Age 35-39 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Gesture) | Male, 40-44 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 40-44 | Unable to Determine |
| Discourtesy: Word | Male, 40-44 | Unable to Determine |
| Discourtesy: Word | Age 35-39 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Discourtesy: Word | Age 35-39 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Discourtesy: Word | Age 35-39 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Discourtesy: Word | Age 35-39 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Penalty: Command Discipline - A | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202201992, March 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property | Black Male, 50-54 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises | Black Male, 50-54 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Black Male, 50-54 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202201430, February 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 40-44 | Complaint Withdrawn |
| Abuse of Authority: Other | Male, 40-44 | Complaint Withdrawn |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Closed: 5/14/2024
Case Details:
- Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Lawsuits
Ortiz, Luis Alberto Cefla vs City of New York, et al.Case # 706322/2023, Supreme Court - Queens, April 4, 2023, ended November 6, 2023
$20,000 Settlement