Stephen F. Dapolito

Stephen F. Dapolito

Stephen F. Dapolito
Badge #2542, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Internal Affairs Bureau since September 2019, active
Also served at 83rd Precinct
Service started January 2007, made $135,000 last year, Tax #943131

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2010-2058
Closed: 7/28/2010

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
2 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Exonerated

Complaint #201209013, May 2012
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Female, 58
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201000984, January 2010
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201209013, May 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Female, 58 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201000984, January 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male, 49 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2010-2058
Closed: 7/28/2010
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on duty, did fail to perform all duties and remain on post until properly relieved.
  2. Guilty: While on duty, did take an rmp out of said officers assigned sector without police purpose or necessity.
  3. Guilty: While on duty, did make a false radio transmission.
Penalty: Vacation days (15 days)


Lawsuits

Walker v. New York City Police Department et al
Case # 17CV04529, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was at a motion hearing for contempt of court when the defendants refused to enforce the court that allowed her to access her $100 billion sweat equity plan and other belongings. Plaintiff suggests that the defendants ignored the fact that Jeffrey Zagelbaum refused to comply with the orders which lead to Jeffrey Zagelbaum having possession of the court order and subsequently robbing the plaintiff. During the robbery, plaintiff was pushed out of her apartment. The defendants did not charge Jeffrey Zagelbaum with the crime of stealing the plaintiff's $100 billion dollars and valuables. The plaintiff believes this is because the defendants conspired with Jeffrey Zagelbaum and Jeffrey Edelman (Zagelbaum'...