Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits.
Owens, Della, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 544730/2025,
Supreme Court - Kings, April 2, 2026
Lema-Paguay, Christian vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 25CV04714,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, August 28, 2025
D.,b., an Infant By Their Png, Deloatch, Vanessa, et al. vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 526182/2024,
Supreme Court - Kings, October 30, 2024
Complaint
Description: On or about June 29, 2023, at approximately 4:00 p.m., Infant-Plaintiff, whose age was less than 12 years old, was walking outside with her aunt when defendant NYPD officers stopped and arrested her without any legal justification. She was not told what she was arrested for. The officers pulled her shirt collar, pulled her arms, pressed her body against a concrete wall and handcuffed her in an excessively tight manner. They repeatedly lifted and dropped her, causing her to hit her head on the police vehicle. A defendant supervisor was present at the scene but failed to stop the unlawful arrest.
At the 90th Precinct, Plaintiff was subjected to search of the intimate parts of her body and was held there for sev...