Michael E. Peck
Badge #22401,
White Male
Service
started November 2020, ended May 2024,
Tax #970061
Complaints
2
Complaints
2
Allegations
0
Substantiated
1
Unable to Determine
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202206530,
September 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
Complaint #202205745,
August 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Complaint #202206530, September 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment | Male, 60-64 | Unable to Determine |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202205745, August 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Male, 45-49 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2022-26002
Closed: 6/22/2022
Case Details:
- Pleaded Guilty: Unfit for duty.
- Pleaded Guilty: Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), ordered breath testing, vacation days (40 days)
Lawsuits
Wohl, Jonathan vs City of Ny, et al.Case # 161878/2023, Supreme Court - New York, December 14, 2023
Complaint
Description: On September 9, 2022, plaintiff was arrested by the defendants at the Union Hall, where he was talking to a Local 79 employee and recording the conversation on his phone. Defendants took custody of plaintiff's work helmet, water bottle, calendar, all of which contain the phrase "Black Lives Matters" and plaintiff's cellular phone. Defendants claimed that plaintiff was trespassing at the Union Hall. They handcuffed him and took him to a precinct, where he was placed in a holding cell. Plaintiff was charged with Criminal Trespass in the Third Degree. Due to the conditions of the cell, plaintiff had panic attacks and chest pain. He did not receive clean drinking water even though requesting it. After severa...