Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Pepper spray (4)
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Force: Pepper spray (4)
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Anhaiz Hercule
Badge #29335,
Black Female
Police Officer at 79th Precinct since December 2024
Also served at
Field Training Unit,
83rd Precinct
Service
started December 2021,
made $78,300 last year,
Tax #973461
Complaints
6
Complaints
16
Allegations
5
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
4
Substantiated (Charges)
4
Complainant Uncooperative
2
Unable to Determine
1
Unfounded
2
Victim Unidentified
2
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202603429,
March 2026
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
Complaint #202501318,
January 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202410140,
October 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Female |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Victim Unidentified |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | White Female |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Victim Unidentified |
Complaint #202407438,
July 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Pepper spray |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 15-17 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Female, 15-17 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| APU Case Status: | Pending |
| Penalty: | APU - Decision Pending |
Complaint #202403952,
April 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Pepper spray |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Female, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Allegation: | Force: Pepper spray |
| Complainant: | Asian Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Allegation: | Force: Pepper spray |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Force: Pepper spray |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Allegation: | Force: Pepper spray |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Property damaged |
| Complainant: | Asian Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Allegation: | Force: Pepper spray |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| APU Case Status: | Pending |
| Penalty: | APU - Decision Pending |
Complaint #202306237,
June 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Female, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
| Complainant: | Female, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Complaint #202603429, March 2026 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment | Black Male, 25-29 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202501318, January 2025 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop | Black Male, 35-39 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202410140, October 2024 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital | White Female | Victim Unidentified |
| Force: Physical force | White Female | Victim Unidentified |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202407438, July 2024 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Pepper spray | Black Female, 15-17 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Female, 15-17 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| APU Case Status: Pending | ||
| Penalty: APU - Decision Pending | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202403952, April 2024 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Pepper spray | White Female, 25-29 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Force: Pepper spray | Asian Male, 21-24 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Force: Pepper spray | Unable to Determine | |
| Force: Pepper spray | Substantiated (Charges) | |
| Force: Pepper spray | Unable to Determine | |
| Abuse of Authority: Property damaged | Asian Male, 21-24 | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Force: Pepper spray | Unfounded | |
| APU Case Status: Pending | ||
| Penalty: APU - Decision Pending | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202306237, June 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Female, 35-39 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Force: Physical force | Female, 35-39 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Female, 35-39 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits.Wicker, Raymel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 509665/2026, Supreme Court - Kings, March 18, 2026
Carrion, Gary vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 24CV03805, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 4, 2024
Complaint
Description: On or about February 27, 2023, Plaintiff was hosting two friends for a barbecue at his home in Brooklyn, NY. Officers arrived at Plaintiff house, and Plaintiff refused to go outside or let them inside. Irritated, the Individual Defendants proceeded to enter through a neighbor's home, jump the fence, and break in through Plaintiff's kitchen. The officers had no lawful authority to enter the home - neither a warrant nor exigent circumstances existed at the time of entry. Several of the Individual Defendants entered the first floor of the home with their guns drawn and proceeded upstairs. Officers immediately placed Plaintiff under arrest. At the same time, the remaining officers entered a second bedroom next to...