Bernadette E. Corry

Badge #11041, White Female
Police Officer at 45th Precinct Domestic Violence Squad since July 2026
Also served at 45th Precinct
Service started October 2017, made $128,000 last year, Tax #964461

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Lawsuit Settlements:
$60,000   Dusablon, Christian vs City of New York, et al., 2020 BCSC BCSC 035587/2020E
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complaint Withdrawn
4 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202501748, February 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202303892, April 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202303903, April 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Female, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202501748, February 2025
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #202303892, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Female, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Female, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202303903, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Female, 65-69 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $60,000 total settlements.

Amelio, Carmine P., et Al vs Houri, Galia, et al.
Case # 22CV00975, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
Zero Disposition

Dusablon, Christian vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 035587/2020E, Supreme Court - Kings, December 22, 2020
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was involved in a car accident a couple of weeks prior to February 13, 2020, and Defendant Officer Corry had been the responding officer at that scene. Plaintiff and Defendant Officer Corry had stayed in touch since and the Plaintiff was waiting on the accident report to be completed for his insurance claim. Defendant Officer Corry had texted the Plaintiff to let him know that the report was ready for pick up at the 45th Precinct. On February 13th, Plaintiff drove to the 45th Precinct in the morning and asked Defendant Officers Rath and Dalessio about the accident report once inside, the officers teased the Plaintiff and told him the report was not yet ready, Officer Corry was not present. When it was...

Dusablon, Christian vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 035587/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, December 22, 2020, ended February 21, 2025
$60,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On February 13, 2020 at approximately 9:30 a.m. Plaintiff was lawfully present inside the 45th Precinct responding to a text from PO Bernadette Corry that a recent accident report was ready to be picked up. Plaintiff's girlfriend was waiting in the car. PO Corry was not present in the lobby. After Plaintiff enquired regarding the report at the front desk POs Alan Dalessio and Christopher Rath began teasing Plaintiff that the report was not ready yet. Plaintiff asked if he could record POs Dalessio and Rath stating the report was not ready so Plaintiff could forward as proof to his insurance company. When Plaintiff began to pull his phone out he was tackled and dragged through the gate by several POs who thereaf...