Daniel G. Efinger

Badge #1735, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Criminal Intelligence Section since May 2026
Also served at 103rd Precinct
Service started January 2015, made $176,000 last year, Tax #957561

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2024-29827
Closed: 3/3/2024
Case: 2021-24501
Closed: 5/20/2022

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$15,000   Holloway, Darren vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 EDNY EDNY 21CV02482
$30,000   Delson, Trystan vs City of New York, et al., 2020 QCSC QCSC 716780/2020
View Details

Complaints

7 Complaints
14 Allegations
4 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
3 Unable to Determine
2 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202401157, January 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Age 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: Age 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202306641, July 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202205856, August 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Age 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Age 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Age 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #201910544, December 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201901699, February 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201810441, December 2018
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201506742, July 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Female, 68
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202401157, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Age 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Age 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202306641, July 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202205856, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Age 15-17 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Age 15-17 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Age 15-17 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #201910544, December 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 50-54 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201901699, February 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Female Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201810441, December 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201506742, July 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Female, 68 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2024-29827
Closed: 3/3/2024
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
  2. Wrongfully stopped a vehicle.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B

Case: 2021-24501
Closed: 5/20/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
  2. Violated patrol rules.
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Training


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $45,000 total settlements.

Holloway, Darren vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 21CV02482, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, May 20, 2021, ended May 11, 2022
$15,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 29, 2019, at approximately 5:25 pm, Defendant Officers (Officers Efinger, Giardina, McKeefrey, Walter, McCarthy, John Doe, and Jane Doe) arrested Mr. Holloway without cause at or within the vicinity of 161-10 Jamaica Avenue, Jamaica. Prior to his arrest, Mr. Holloway was visiting his cousin, George Brown, at his place of business – Mr. Holloway was tightly handcuffed to the point he began experiencing pain and numbness and was also subjected to a search but found no stolen items, contraband, or unlawful items on him. According to Defendant Officers, an individual named Elvira Minode La Torre had informed them that after withdrawing money from a Chase Bank, at approximately 2:30 pm, Mr. Holloway approach...

Delson, Trystan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 716780/2020, Supreme Court - Queens, September 30, 2020, ended July 24, 2023
$30,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 8, 2019, plaintiff was engaging in physically flirtatious behavior with her boyfriend when defendant POs Brandon Carlo, Daniel Effinger and John Does, grabbed, assaulted and arrested her boyfriend. When she pleaded with them to stop the arrest, defendant POs handcuffed and arrested her, charging her with obstructing governmental administration, resisting arrest and disorderly conduct, even tough she had at no time interfered with the arrest of her boyfriend or engaged in any other criminal or unlawful behavior. The charges against her were dismissed at the time of her arraignment upon application of the Office of the District Attorney.

Guzman, Adriana vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 18CV05206, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 7, 2018
Complaint
Description: On June 18, 2017, Defendant officers Giovanni, Rivera, Daniel, Efinger, and Sergeant John Gheradi responded to investigate a report that an assault had occurred. The report defendants received of the alleged assailant were fully distinct from Plaintiff and that the alleged victim was intoxicated and highly uncooperative. Further, one of the Defendant officers, believed to be Efinger had a video confirming that Plaintiff was not the assailant. Despite this, Defendants Efinger, Rivera, and Gheradi, lacking any probably cause to believe Plaintiff had committed a crime, falsely arrested Plaintiff for the alleged assault. One of the Defendants, believed to be Efinger, placed overtight handcuffs on Plaintiff's wrists...

Other Documents