Randy Zerling

Badge #4434, White Male
Sergeant at 40th Precinct since February 2018, active
Service started January 2005, made $183,000 last year, Tax #937786

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2016-15827
Closed: 5/17/2016

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
4 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202206248, September 2022
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201806729, August 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201803163, April 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Female, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202206248, September 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201806729, August 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Male, 21 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201803163, April 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Female, 44 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2016-15827
Closed: 5/17/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While off-duty, was involved in a physical altercation with a person known to the Department.
  2. Guilty: While off-duty, having been involved in an off-duty incident, did thereafter fail and neglect to report said incident to the Patrol Supervisor.
  3. Guilty: While off-duty, did wrongfully consume an intoxicant to the extent that said officer was unfit for duty.
  4. Guilty: Did wrongfully and without just cause prevent or interfere with an official Department investigation.
Penalty: Counseling, vacation days (30 days)


Lawsuits

Robinson, Ayesha vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 804816/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, April 6, 2023