Jose J. Taveras
Deputy Inspector at Professional Standards Bureau since February 2026
Also served at
Enterprise Risk Mgmt Section,
23rd Precinct,
Housing Borough Bronx Queens IM,
32nd Precinct,
26th Precinct
Service
started January 2007,
made $231,000 last year,
Tax #943861
Hispanic Male
Complaints
3
Complaints
5
Allegations
0
Substantiated
1
Exonerated
2
Unable to Determine
1
Unfounded
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202403517,
February 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Force: Restricted Breathing |
| Complainant: | Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
Complaint #202203024,
May 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #201016657,
November 2010
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Complaint #202403517, February 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 25-29 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 25-29 | Unable to Determine |
| Force: Restricted Breathing | Male, 25-29 | Unable to Determine |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202203024, May 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Hispanic Male, 25-29 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201016657, November 2010 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 20 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Gomez, Benito vs City of New York, et al.Case # 302331/2015, Supreme Court - Bronx, June 19, 2015