Ashley R. Turzer

Badge #26919, White Female
Police Officer at Detective Borough Bronx South since May 2026
Also served at Detective Borough Bronx, 44th Precinct
Service started January 2019, made $167,000 last year, Tax #967371

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25118
Closed: 5/18/2022
Case: 2022-25119
Closed: 5/18/2022

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
5 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 OMB PEG Directive Closure
2 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202501804, February 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202409362, September 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details

Complaint #202003163, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202501804, February 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202409362, September 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Female OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details
Complaint #202003163, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Male, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25118
Closed: 5/18/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully threatened to arrest an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B

Case: 2022-25119
Closed: 5/18/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to activate their body worn camera.
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Ramos, Jose vs P.O. Turzer, Ashley, et al.
Case # 811122/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 18, 2021
Complaint
Description: On May 17, 2020, in the late morning/early afternoon, Plaintiff Jose Ramos returned to apartment 2G at 1455 Townsend Avenue in Bronx County, when he was confronted by four Defendant NYPD Police Officers who proceeded to strike Plaintiff and place him under arrest. Plaintiff was arrested and detained until arraignment on May 21, 2020. Plaintiff brings claims of: excessive force, assault and battery, failure to intervene, negligence, respondeat superior, and false arrest.