Christin Rodeschin

Badge #3844, White Female
Former Police Officer at Detective Bureau Special Vicims Division Zone 3
Also served at 101st Precinct
Service started July 2004, ended August 2015, Tax #935571

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Complaints

2 Complaints
5 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200617309, December 2006
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200611440, August 2006
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Instructions
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Complaint #200617309, December 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 36 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200611440, August 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 18 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 18 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 18 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Black Male Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Instructions
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Dailey, Jesse vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 514478/2016, Supreme Court - Kings, August 25, 2016
Complaint
Description: On November 20, 2013, at approximately 10:45-11:00am, Plaintiff Jesse Dailey was falsely arrested while in front of 302 13th Street in Brooklyn, NY by Defendant NYPD officers CHRISTINE RODESCHIN and REINER FEHRENBACH who falsely claimed that Plaintiff had assaulted Rodeschin. The complaint alleges that it was Rodeschin who initiated the contact by accosting and harassing the Plaintiff for his alleged involvement in the sexual abuse of a child on September 20, 2013 at 11 Water Street in Brooklyn, and on November 11, 2013 in front of 297 4th Street in Brooklyn. The complaint does not specify the length of Plaintiff's initial incarceration and only states that Plaintiff "was restricted and partially deprived of hi...