Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $145,000 total settlements.
Mcgibbon, David Jr. vs Sergeant Leudesdorff, Karl et al.
Case # 13CV03001,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, May 24, 2013, ended October 16, 2013
$55,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 11, 2010, Plaintiff was lawfully operating his vehicle. Defendants ordered Plaintiff out of the vehicle with guns drawn. Plaintiff complied with the Defendants’ commands. Defendants demanded his identification. Plaintiff ultimately produced his identification. Defendants illegally searched Plaintiff and his car. No contraband was recovered. Plaintiff was handcuffed from behind excessively tightly. While handcuffed, Defendant Kalogiros aggressively approached Plaintiff and sucker-punched Plaintiff squarely in his face. Defendants further assaulted and battered Plaintiff. Plaintiff was eventually taken to the 113th Precinct. At the precinct the officers falsely informed employees of the Queens County Dist...
Stephenson v. The City of New York et al
Case # 10CV01040,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
$35,000 Settlement
Stipulation,
Amended Complaint
McClary et al v. Nieves et al
Case # 12CV05300,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
$55,000 Settlement
Settlement,
Complaint
Description: A neighbor falsely reported that Plaintiff 1 had a gun on him and was harassing her, when in reality he was visiting home and catching up with his sister, Plaintiff 2. The police arrived at the home and broke down the door, dragged Plaintiff 2 outside and handcuffed Plaintiff 1. Both plaintiffs were taken to the 113th Precinct and the house was searched without a warrant. The unspecified charges against both plaintiffs were dismissed. In addition to this incident, in an earlier encounter the same officers had entered their home without a warrant and destroyed the property in such a way where it was uninhabitable during the time of its repairs. The officers mocked the plaintiffs for the previous incident.