Nunzio Vetrano

Nunzio Vetrano

Nunzio Vetrano
Badge #8158, White Male
Former Police Officer at 24th Precinct
Service started October 2019, ended May 2024, Tax #968871

Substantiated Allegations:
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-28317
Closed: 9/7/2023

View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
10 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Unable to Determine
2 Unfounded
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202402777, March 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202308320, August 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202208371, September 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202201642, March 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Black Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202201364, February 2022
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202008014, November 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 51
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202402777, March 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 30-34 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202308320, August 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 50-54 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202208371, September 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 60-64 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202201642, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Black Female, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202201364, February 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202008014, November 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 51 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-28317
Closed: 9/7/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Bautista, Danilo vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 156883/2023, Supreme Court - New York, July 17, 2023
Complaint
Description: On or about August 20, 2022 plaintiff was detained by the defendants and falsely accused of intent to cause physical injury to another person by means of a dangerous weapon. He was falsely accused of the aforesaid criminal act or acts after acting in self-defense after being brutally attacked by a perpetrator who punched and kicked and/or stumped his body. He was arrested by defendants and placed into a cell and imprisoned for the course of 2 days and was formally arraigned and processed on August 21, 2022. This arrest has caused the plaintiff to be hospitalized after a rise in blood pressure and anxiety caused by the unlawful detention. The defendants took his high school ring (worth ca. $2,000), but did not...