Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $40,000 total settlements.
Mciver-Cole, Joyce vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 160932/2016,
Supreme Court - New York, April 6, 2017
Complaint
Description: On or about October 1, 2015, defendant NYPD officers Frederic Disla (Shield No. 10123), Marcus Colon (Shield No. 14439), Ricky Ransom (Shield No. 7214), along with unnamed defendant NYPD officers, arrested plaintiff at a Manhattan precinct as plaintiff was reporting that she had been assaulted by an ex-boyfriend, among others. Plaintiff was falsely charged with assaulting a member of her ex-boyfriend's family. Plaintiff was later arrested once more, on October 14, 2015, for purportedly making threatening calls and sending threatening text messages to her ex-boyfriend. Defendant NYPD officers had reason to know the allegations against plaintiff by her ex-boyfriend were without merit. Plaintiff suffered emotiona...
Perry, Howard vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 400246/2012,
Supreme Court - New York, November 9, 2011, ended September 18, 2013
$40,000 Settlement