Thomas J. Bilach

Badge #2505, White Male
Sergeant at Office of Information Technology since September 2025
Service started July 2009, made $140,000 last year, Tax #948181

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (2)
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2021-23786
Closed: 9/28/2022

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
7 Allegations
4 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Unfounded
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202206795, July 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202201365, March 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 13, 2026
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202206795, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202201365, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Female, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 13, 2026
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2021-23786
Closed: 9/28/2022
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Made inappropriate comments
Penalty: Training, vacation days (20 days)


Lawsuits

Short, Derrick vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 516775/2025, Supreme Court - Kings, September 11, 2025