James J. Scagnelli

James J. Scagnelli

James J. Scagnelli
Badge #14689, White Male
Police Officer at 6th Precinct since January 2019
Service started July 2017, made $152,000 last year, Tax #964281

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number

Discipline Cases:

Closed: 6/8/2022
Case: 1 Allegation

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
3 Unfounded

Complaint #202308341, September 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202205895, September 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202005507, August 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Asian Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202308341, September 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 50-54 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 50-54 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Male, 50-54 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202205895, September 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202005507, August 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Female Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Asian Female, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Closed: 6/8/2022
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Other Documents