John J. Feng

John J. Feng

John J. Feng
Former Lieutenant at Queens Court Section
Also served at 41st Precinct, 71st Precinct
Service started January 2005, ended August 2025, Tax #936581
Asian Male

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-27219
Closed: 4/21/2023
Case: 2022-26982
Closed: 12/9/2022

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$32,500   Pichardo, Sandro vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 BCSC BCSC 800017/2021E
$45,000   Paulino, Franklin, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2020 BCSC BCSC 022365/2020E
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
3 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Exonerated

Complaint #202103227, May 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 5 days)
additional details

Complaint #202103096, May 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #201701670, March 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202103227, May 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 5 days)
additional details
Complaint #202103096, May 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Female, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #201701670, March 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Hispanic Female, 28 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-27219
Closed: 4/21/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Training

Case: 2022-26982
Closed: 12/9/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to prepare required reports.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (5 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $77,500 total settlements.

Pichardo, Sandro vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 800017/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, January 5, 2021, ended December 5, 2022
$32,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 2, 2018, P.O.s Melvin Payamps and John Feng, along with unknown John and Jane Doe officers, approached Plaintiff Sandro Pichardo in the Bronx. They searched and arrested Mr. Pichardo with no probable cause. The officers assaulted and battered Mr. Pichardo. They rear-handcuffed him and transported him to a precinct where he was searched, questioned, photographed, and fingerprinted by or at the direction of P.O.s Payamps and Feng. The officers later made false statements to a prosecutor to initiate Mr. Pichardo's prosecution; they were fully aware that he did not commit criminal possession of marijuana or unlawful possession of marijuana or resisting arrest. All charges were later favorably dismisse...

Paulino, Franklin, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 022365/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 20, 2020, ended November 20, 2020
$45,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On December 12, 2019, plaintiffs were lawfully in the vicinity of East 163rd Street and Kelly Street, when defendant police officers, without any probable cause or legal justification, summarily stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered, and detained plaintiffs with excessive force. Plaintiffs were then handcuffed and arrested. Plaintiffs were strip-searched in custody, and during arraignment they were falsely prosecuted with committing a crime. All charges against plaintiffs were eventually terminated in their favor. As a result of the incident, plaintiffs sustained severe physical and emotional injuries.

Hobbs, Terrance vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 157162/2017, Supreme Court - New York, August 16, 2017
Complaint
Description: On August 23, 2014, Plaintiff was put into handcuffs, arrested, and placed into the rear of a marked NYPD radio motor patrol vehicle. Plaintiff was not told why he was being arrested. Plaintiff was charged with numerous crimes and was incarcerated for approximately one year. The charges were dismissed on October 27, 2016.

Other Documents