Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $30,000 total settlements.
Butler, Marquis vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 303340/2016,
Supreme Court - Bronx, October 21, 2016, ended October 3, 2017
$30,000 Settlement
White, Arthur vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 303483/2015,
Supreme Court - Bronx, September 3, 2015
Complaint
Description: On June 17, 2014, the Defendants (Police Officers Warren Lopez, Haroldy Cabreja, and other NYPD Police officers whose names are not known at this time) without having legal cause, wrongfully touched, grabbed, handcuffed and seized the Plaintiff, Arthur White in an excessive manner about his person, causing him physical pain and mental suffering. The Defendants placed Plaintiff in imminent fear of physical contact by approaching the Plaintiff with their loaded firearms,
outstretched limbs and other objects which they used to physically seize, strike
and restrain the Plaintiff. The Defendants wrongfully and unlawfully arrested the Plaintiff, restrained him and his liberty then took him into custody to a police st...