Santiago E. Gomez

Badge #19288, Hispanic Male
Former Police Officer at Transit Bureau District 1
Also served at US Open Tennis Detail, 105th Precinct
Service started July 2001, ended November 2022, Tax #928391


Complaints

4 Complaints
6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Exonerated
1 Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202201188, February 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
additional details

Complaint #200615601, November 2006
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200405946, June 2004
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200309436, November 2003
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202201188, February 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation Hispanic Female, 30-34 Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
additional details
Complaint #200615601, November 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Black Male, 39 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200405946, June 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 18 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 18 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200309436, November 2003
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Male Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search Male Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2010-408
Document
Opened: 3/16/2010
Closed: 4/21/2010
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While off duty and working a paid detail failed to safeguard said officer's service firearm.
  2. Guilty: Whi le off duty and working a paid detail failed to maintain activity log entries.
  3. Guilty: While off duty submitted inaccurate documentation to the Department requesting payment for time not performed at a paid detail.
  4. Guilty: Failed to safeguard prisoner property.
Penalty: Suspended w/o pay (20 days), vacation days (20 days)


Other Documents

Bronx DA Notified Officer List