Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $55,000 total settlements.
Simmons, Isaiah vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 812671/2024E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, August 12, 2024, ended March 19, 2025
$40,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On May 12, 2023, Plaintiff was standing with other people when he was stopped, handcuffed and arrested by Defendants-Police Officer Stephen Oswald, Lieutenant Christopher Crane, Police Officer Matthew Barlow, Police Officer Ernst Celestin, and unnamed John Doe police officers. Plaintiff asserts that he was wounded and suffered/continues to suffer great physical pain and great bodily injuries. Plaintiff was charged with obstructing governmental administration in the second degree, harassment in the second degree, resisting arrest and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree. On May 14, 2023, these charges against Plaintiff were dismissed.
Thomas, Nazir , et Al vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 808302/2024E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, May 22, 2024, ended November 19, 2024
$15,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On February 28, 2024, the plaintiff was without just cause, probable cause, or provocation, recklessly and negligently touched, grabbed, handcuffed, seized, and arrested with excessive force by NYPD officers, including Officer Earnest Celestin, John Doe, and Jane Roe. While lawfully present, the plaintiff was falsely accused of committing a crime. During his custody, the plaintiff was subjected to intentional assault, battery, searches, and humiliation by the officers, resulting in serious and permanent injuries. As a result, the plaintiff required medical attention and was prevented from attending his usual occupation and duties.