Jesse T. Hard

Badge #23523, White Male
Police Officer at 67th Precinct since October 2020
Service started January 2019, made $168,000 last year, Tax #967102

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25749
Closed: 2/26/2023

View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
7 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202409928, September 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202204638, July 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202104681, July 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202008044, November 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202003068, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201909671, October 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Black Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202409928, September 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202204638, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202104681, July 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202008044, November 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Black Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202003068, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201909671, October 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Black Male, 30 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25749
Closed: 2/26/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongful entry of a premises.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits.

Smith, Antwon vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 505015/2026, Supreme Court - Kings, February 19, 2026

Joseph, Emmercia Hinds, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 524293/2024, Supreme Court - Kings, October 10, 2024
Complaint
Description: On or about June 11, 2023, Plaintiffs requested the assistance of the NYPD at a residence. When the NYPD arrived, they falsely arrested, detained, and transported all Plaintiffs to a precinct and thereafter to Central Booking. The officers caused charges to be brought against Plaintiffs through the intentional use of false evidence or testimony. The DA's office subsequently declined to prosecute charges against Plaintiffs.

Gravesande, Cheryl vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 522373/2022, Supreme Court - Bronx, October 11, 2022
Complaint
Description: On or about August 4, 2019, the Plaintiff, Cheryl Gravesande, was falsely arrested in her backyard in Brooklyn by two defendants police officers, Jesse Hard aka Jesse Hart and, Jessica Thomas. Defendants police officers falsely accused and falsely arrested the Plaintiff for selling liquor in her backyard. Defendants police officers were negligent in the prosecution and investigation proceedings, as they failed to investigate information that would have demonstrated Plaintiff's innocence. Defendants acted forcibly in apprehending, arresting and imprisoning Plaintiff. The mailicious prosecution ended in Plaintiff's favor, as all charges were dismissed on August 4, 2019.

Gravesande, Cheryl vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # GI, Supreme Court - Bronx, October 11, 2022

Other Documents