Vinceta H. Gishard
Badge #4372,
Black Female
Sergeant at Manhattan Standards and Assessment Unit since July 2025
Also served at
Crime Control Strategies,
Ssd Juvenile Crime Desk,
Summer Youth Police Academy,
Chief of Department Office,
7th Precinct,
13th Precinct
Service
started January 2007,
made $139,000 last year,
Tax #943302
Complaints
3
Complaints
4
Allegations
0
Substantiated
2
Exonerated
2
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #202004450,
September 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
Complaint #201704887,
June 2017
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Female, 56 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
Complaint #201113073,
April 2011
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 43 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number |
| Complainant: | White Male, 43 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Complaint #202004450, September 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Female, 35-39 | Unsubstantiated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201704887, June 2017 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | White Female, 56 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201113073, April 2011 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Male, 43 | Exonerated |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number | White Male, 43 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case Details:
- Guilty: Did fail to safeguard a prisoner
Penalty: Forfeiture of ten (10 ) vacation days
Lawsuits
Santiago-Perez, Bartolo vs City of Ny, et al.Case # 152341/2022, Supreme Court - New York, March 24, 2022
Complaint
Description: On April 17, 2021, outside of the plaintiff's apartment, defendant officers attacked, battered, and plaintiff. As a result of the assault, plaintiff broke his arm in multiple places. Defendant officers then proceeded to handcuff and detain plaintiff, falsely charging him with various criminal offenses without basis. Plaintiff spent over 24 hours in custody. After posting bail, plaintiff underwent surgery to repair a number of fractured bones in his arm. Defendant officers acted in concert to fabricate charges and manufacture stories to justify their assault.