Xavier Reynoso

Xavier Reynoso

Xavier Reynoso
Badge #2922, Hispanic Male
Sergeant at Internal Affairs Bureau since November 2025
Also served at Patrol Borough Manhattan North Public Safety Teams, 30th Precinct, Narcotics Borough Manhattan North, 34th Precinct
Service started July 2005, made $162,000 last year, Tax #939302

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Hit against inanimate object

Lawsuit Settlements:
$30,000   Ross, Stefon vs City of Ny, et al., 2023 NYCSC NYCSC 159471/2023
$20,000   Ortiz, Robert J. vs Police Department, Nyc, et al., 2019 SDNY SDNY 19CV03522
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
10 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
4 Alleged Victim Unavailable
3 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded

Complaint #202307248, July 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202300530, January 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201806662, August 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Trial verdict reversed by PC, Final verdict Not Guilty, November 30, 2021
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201301842, March 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 60
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201013080, September 2010
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202307248, July 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 30-34 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 30-34 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202300530, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Age 21-24 Alleged Victim Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male Alleged Victim Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Age 21-24 Alleged Victim Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Male Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201806662, August 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 27 Unfounded
Force: Hit against inanimate object Hispanic Male, 27 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Trial verdict reversed by PC, Final verdict Not Guilty, November 30, 2021
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201301842, March 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 60 Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201013080, September 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 47 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $50,000 total settlements.

Ross, Stefon vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 159471/2023, Supreme Court - New York, October 10, 2023, ended August 5, 2025
$30,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On September 28, 2022, Plaintiff was in the vicinity of Opus Lounge when Officers Robert Velsor, Xavier Reynoso, Derek Rivera, and others harassed, stopped, seized, handcuffed, pushed, slammed, punched, kicked, placed their body upon Plaintiff’s back and ankles, and tased Plaintiff without probable cause or reasonable suspicion of any criminal offense. Plaintiff complained about tight handcuffs, which severely injured Plaintiff’s wrists. Other Defendant officers failed to intervene. Plaintiff did not resist arrest and complied with all lawful orders. Plaintiff was not told what he was being arrested for. Defendants falsely stated to the New York County’s District Attorney’s Office that Plaintiff committed a cri...

Ortiz, Robert J. vs Police Department, Nyc, et al.
Case # 19CV03522, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, June 27, 2019, ended November 7, 2022
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On August 18, 2017, police officers arrested plaintiff. One officer used a chokehold while plaintiff was being attacked and thrown to the ground. Once plaintiff was handcuffed, the officers picked him up and conducted a pat frisk. One officer touched plaintiff's private parts in a public area. Plaintiff sustained laceration to his rib cage and face and has suffered mental issues since the incident.

Rogers, Jowan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 150751/2016, Supreme Court - New York, February 19, 2016, ended September 9, 2024
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On June 9, 2014, Plaintiff was shopping for sneakers and was arrested by Police Officers Garfield Mead, Xavier Reynoso, and four John Doe police officers for robbery and possession of crack. Plaintiff did not rob anyone nor was in possession of anyone else's belongings or any drugs. Bail was set at arraignment and bailed out after being incarcerated for approximately four days. Following four court appearances, the case against Plaintiff was dismissed on motion of the prosecutor. Plaintiff's probation was violated because of this arrest and he spent approximately seven weeks in jail. Plaintiff was deprived of his liberty and sustained great emotional injuries.

Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 11/30/2021