Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case: 2008-486
Opened: 1/30/2008
Closed: 3/29/2012
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
Failed to attend intact training, range training and undercover transition course
-
Guilty:
Failed to make required entries in the movement sheet on approximately thirty-seven (37) occasions
-
Guilty:
Failed to sign in and/or out of the command on approximately twenty (6) occasions
-
Guilty:
On four different occasions, fai led to adjust said member's tour resulting in being overpaid two (2) hours and thirty-nine (39) minutes of overtime
-
Guilty:
Failed to maintain detective's daily activity report.
-
Guilty:
Wrongfully worked a tour without adjusting said member's tour or submitting a of-28.
-
Guilty:
Failed to sign in for rdo court.
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgment is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year. Forfeiture of ninety (90) vacation days.
Case: 2010-1316
Opened: 4/28/2010
Closed: 3/29/2012
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
Wrongfully resided outside New York City or the resident counties
-
Guilty:
Failed to safeguard said member's service firearm
-
Guilty:
Wrongfully left said member's service firearm unattended resulting in its loss
-
Guilty:
Failed to notify the precinct of occurrence of the loss of said firearm in a timely manner
-
Guilty:
Wrongfully went to court unarmed
-
Guilty:
Wrongfully impeded a Department investigation by stating that said member resided at a location in Bronx county when in fact he resided in a location in New Jersey.
Penalty: See case# 2008-486 for penalty
Case: 2011-5657
Opened: 9/9/2011
Closed: 3/29/2012
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
Wrongfully made a series of discourteous remarks to an individual known to the Department based on said individual's ethnicity or race
-
Guilty:
Failed to make activity log entries regarding said incident
Penalty: See case# 2008-486 for penalty