Dowen S. Thompson

Badge #3665, Black Male

Former Detective Grade 3 at Crimes Against Persons Unit

Also served at Detective Bureau Central Robbery Division, Queens Robbery Squad, Transit Bureau District 32

Service started January 2006, ended May 2025, Tax #940802

Lawsuit Settlements:
$17,500 Small, Cary St.charles vs City of New York, et al., 2013 KCSC KCSC 020716/2013
View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints

5 Allegations

0 Substantiated

3 Exonerated

2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201306584, July 2013

Allegation:	Force: Pepper spray
Complainant:	Black Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Allegation:	Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant:	Black Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

additional details

Complaint #201205321, April 2012

Allegation:	Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant:	Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Force: Pepper spray
Complainant:	Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

additional details

Complaint #201306584, July 2013
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Force: Pepper spray	Black Male, 17	Exonerated
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)	Black Male, 17	Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201205321, April 2012
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)	Male, 29	Unsubstantiated
Force: Gun Pointed		Unsubstantiated
Force: Pepper spray	Male, 29	Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $17,500 total settlements.

Mattingly, Sherry, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV00733, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, February 13, 2015, ended October 29, 2015
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On December 15, 2014, plaintiffs were attempting to enter the subway. Defendants ran up to the plaintiffs and threw them against the subway station wall. When plaintiffs protested, a defendant, possibly Manuel Mercedes, took a canister of mace and spread it at one of the plaintiffs. Plaintiff fell to the floor, screaming in pain. The other plaintiff started screaming for help, at which point defendant officer, possibly Daniel Priber, punched her in the eye causing plaintiff to fall to the floor and suffer bruising, swelling, and substantial pain. Defendants arrested plaintiffs and charged them. Plaintiffs were arraigned, and were given an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal.

Small, Cary St.charles vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 020716/2013, Supreme Court - Kings, December 2, 2013, ended February 6, 2014
$17,500 Settlement

Dowen S. Thompson

Complaints

Conclusion Meanings:

Lawsuits

Other Documents