Ashfaqur Rahman

Badge #5014, Asian Male
Detective Specialist at 28th Precinct since May 2021
Service started November 2020, Tax #970112

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2024-29803
Closed: 4/23/2024

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$80,000   Howard, Clifton vs City of Ny, et al., 2025 NYCSC NYCSC 159310/2025
View Details

Complaints

9 Complaints
16 Allegations
5 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Unavailable
2 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
5 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202602930, March 2026
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202509581, September 2025
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202501459, February 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202500145, January 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
additional details

Complaint #202309483, October 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202310103, September 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202303278, April 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202305398, April 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Formalized Training
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, April 6, 2026
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202206846, October 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202602930, March 2026
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40-44 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202509581, September 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202501459, February 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202500145, January 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
additional details
Complaint #202309483, October 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40-44 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202310103, September 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202303278, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male, 18-20 Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Black Male, 18-20 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #202305398, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force Black Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 10-14 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Formalized Training
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, April 6, 2026
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202206846, October 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2024-29803
Closed: 4/23/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Named in 5 known lawsuits, $80,000 total settlements.

Mariko, Ismaila vs City of New York et al.
Case # 155702/2026, Supreme Court - New York, May 26, 2026

Howard, Clifton vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 159310/2025, Supreme Court - New York, July 22, 2025, ended March 27, 2026
$80,000 Settlement

Grant, Raheim J. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 157936/2025, Supreme Court - New York, July 3, 2025

Perry, Christopher Jr. & Perry, Christopher vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 162289/2024, Supreme Court - New York, December 30, 2024
Complaint
Description: On June 16, 2024, plaintiffs were lawfully present in the vicinity of Lenox Avenue and West 119th Street, County of New York. POs Ashfaqur Rahman, Sohral Peerzada, Walter Mancilla, Arun Prashad, Matthew Grieve, Damien Weber, and unnamed POs, without probable cause, an arrest warrant, or any legal justification, stopped, seized, searched, and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs were then falsely and maliciously prosecuted and required to make numerous court appearances, until all charges against them were terminated favorably. Plaintiffs sustained physical and emotional pain and injuries as a result of this incident.

Gonzalez, Daishaun vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 153896/2024, Supreme Court - New York, May 1, 2024
Complaint
Description: On December 11, 2022, around 7:30 P.M., plaintiff Daishaun Gonzalez was stopped, detained, battered, assaulted, and falsely arrested. Plaintiff was falsely accused of illegal acts, illegally seized with outstretched hands that violently and aggressively grabbed Plaintiff's head and body. Plaintiff was placed in excessively tight handcuffs and transported to the NYPD 28th Precinct where he was detained, booked, and transferred to Central Booking where he was placed in a dark, dirty cell until his release on December 12, 2022. Plaintiff was held for approximately fourteen (14) hours. Plaintiff was targeted because of his race or national origin and because of his Hispanic and Latino heritage.