Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits.
Lugo, William Vs. City of New York et al.
Case # 811120/2026E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, June 9, 2026
Naquwan, Tyson vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 804088/2024E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, June 13, 2024
Brown, Fontain vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 806040/2024,
Supreme Court - Bronx, April 12, 2024
Complaint
Description: On February 19, 2024, Plaintiff FONTAIN BROWN was unlawfully stopped and arrested by defendants POLICE OFFICER JONATHAN RODRIGUEZ, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE, and POLICE OFFICER JOHN ROE. Plaintiff FONTAIN BROWN was arraigned after his arrest and thereafter falsely and maliciously prosecuted with committing a crime. Plaintiff FONTAIN BROWN remained incarcerated for over 24 hours and was required to make numerous court appearances over an extended period of time until all charges against him were terminated favorably.