Jerelme V. Herasme

Badge #4203, Hispanic Male
Sergeant at Warrant Section since April 2025
Also served at 25th Precinct, 43rd Precinct
Service started July 2016, made $168,000 last year, Tax #961812

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (2)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number

Complaints

4 Complaints
11 Allegations
4 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Alleged Victim Unavailable
4 Unable to Determine
1 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202504589, April 2025
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202411323, November 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Previously Adjudicated
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Warned and Admonished) / Instructions
additional details

Complaint #202409164, September 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Dominican Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Dominican Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Dominican Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #201804969, June 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: White Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202504589, April 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male, 25-29 Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202411323, November 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Previously Adjudicated
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Warned and Admonished) / Instructions
additional details
Complaint #202409164, September 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Dominican Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Dominican Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Dominican Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #201804969, June 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop White Male, 34 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Hayes, Roland vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 153750/2019, Supreme Court - New York, April 17, 2019
Complaint
Description: On or about January 18, 2018, Roland Hayes ("Plaintiff") found a phone in/nr a restaurant and was unlawfully arrested then imprisoned by Police Officer Jerelme Herasme, Sergeant David Kaeron, Police Officers John and Jane Doe 1-5 ("Defendant Officers"). The Defendant Officers claimed this was due to the Plaintiff's record for committing a sex offence. The Owner of the phone had stated he did not want charges pressed but false criminal process were initiated for petit larceny. The CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY, DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION and Defendant Officers knew or should have known, through the exercise of proper procedure and reasonable investigation, that the subject arrest, imprisonment, and prosecution ...