Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Leana P. Mejia
Badge #9571,
Hispanic Female
Police Officer at 67th Precinct since February 2026
Service
started October 2015,
made $140,000 last year,
Tax #959812
Complaints
3
Complaints
7
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Alleged Victim Uncooperative
4
Unable to Determine
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202304949,
June 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Age 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Age 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| Complainant: | Age 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
| Complainant: | Age 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #202205216,
July 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
Complaint #201809611,
November 2018
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Alleged Victim Uncooperative |
| Complaint #202304949, June 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Age 45-49 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Age 45-49 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Age 45-49 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Age 45-49 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202205216, July 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Female, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint | Black Female, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201809611, November 2018 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 40 | Alleged Victim Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.