Julio E. Lasalle

Badge #3518, Hispanic Male, 44
Detective Grade 1 at Firearms Suppression Section since January 2025
Also served at Detective Bureau Gun Violence Suppression Division, Organized Crime Investigation Division, 40th Precinct, Gang Squad Manhattan
Service started January 2005, made $209,000 last year, Tax #936912

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Complaints

7 Complaints
14 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
3 Complaint Withdrawn
5 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201500655, January 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: Not Guilty - DCT
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201111407, September 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200714039, September 2007
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 50
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200709703, July 2007
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200706913, May 2007
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #200609684, July 2006
Allegation: Force: Gun fired
Complainant: Black Female, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200511411, September 2005
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Black Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201500655, January 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 16 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 16 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 16 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: Not Guilty - DCT
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201111407, September 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 24 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200714039, September 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 24 Exonerated
Offensive Language: Race Black Male, 21 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 50 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200709703, July 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 19 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200706913, May 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 31 Complaint Withdrawn
Discourtesy: Word Male, 31 Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Male, 31 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #200609684, July 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun fired Black Female, 34 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200511411, September 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Black Male, 23 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Cannella, Tajon vs Detective Lasalle, Julio, et al.
Case # 151531/2018, Supreme Court - New York, May 24, 2018
Complaint
Description: On February 18, 2015 at approximately 9:45 pm Plaintiff was inside his bedroom at 388 Pearl Street Apt 5f, New York, NY when Defendants, NYPD officers, executed a search warrant for Plaintiff's apartment that Defendants obtained from investigating Plaintiff's brother who has been classified as a gang member by the NYPD and has been arrested on several occasions. Defendants entered the apartment with their guns drawn and told everyoen in the apartment to get onto the floor. Defendants broke through plaintiff's locked bedroom door and pointed their gun at plaintiff, threw him down in a violent manner, kicked him onthe floor and unlawfully handcuffed him without probable cause. Defendants unlawfully searched and ...

Terry, James vs Detective Lasalle, Julio, et al.
Case # 151530/2018, Supreme Court - New York, May 24, 2018
Complaint
Description: On February 18, 2015, the plaintiff was lawfully visiting a friend at the friend's lower Manhattan apartment when NYPD detectives, officers, a lieutenant, a sergeant, and a captain forcefully entered with guns drawn. The NYPD officials ordered the occupants to freeze and drop to the floor—an instruction that the plaintiff obeyed. While the plaintiff lie face down on the floor, the NYPD officers kicked him repeatedly, causing him pain. At no time did the NYPD defendants have an objective, factual basis to believe that the plaintiff violated any laws. The plaintiff showed the NYPD defendants his government-issued identification card establishing that he was not a resident of the apartment. Nevertheless, the ...

Other Documents