Gerard Garced

Badge #603, Hispanic Male
Detective Grade 3 at Narcotics Borough Manhattan North since December 2024
Also served at US Open Tennis Detail, 34th Precinct
Service started January 2018, made $176,000 last year, Tax #965122

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Discipline Cases:

Closed: 8/3/2022
Case: 1 Allegation
Case: 2021-24250
Closed: 1/3/2022

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
12 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
6 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202411348, November 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Dominican Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Dominican Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Dominican Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202412762, September 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain
Complainant: Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202008242, August 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202411348, November 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Female, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Female, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Dominican Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Dominican Female, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Dominican Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Female Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202412762, September 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Female, 55-59 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain Female, 55-59 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Female, 55-59 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #202008242, August 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises White Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital White Male, 35-39 Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Closed: 8/3/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongful entry of a premises.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2021-24250
Closed: 1/3/2022
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Failed to make proper notifications. Failed to prepare required reports. failed to make required entries in Department logs..
  2. Pleaded Guilty: Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
  3. Pleaded Guilty: Made computer inquiries unrelated to official Department business. Misused Department electronics. wrongfully accessed confidential Department information..
  4. Pleaded Guilty: Violated patrol rules.
Penalty: Vacation days (30 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Garcia, Steven vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 153065/2025, Supreme Court - New York, March 10, 2025

Garcia, Steven vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 156902/2022, Supreme Court - New York, September 8, 2022
Complaint
Description: On or about August 7, 2019, officers Hansel Salcedo and Micheal Levy arrested Plaintiff in front of 127 Vermilyea Avenue and refused to give him a reason for his arrest dispite Plaintiff asking it. During the arrest, the officers hit Plaintiff several times, by kicking and punching him with no justification. No officers on the scene tried to stop the beating. As a result of defendants' actions, Plaintiff suffered injuries, including emotional distress, nightmares, panic attacks, mental anguish and unwarranted severe anger bouts, some or all of which may be permanent. Plaintiff was prosecuted.

Other Documents

DA Disclosure Letter