Eric J. Warren

Badge #3153, Black Male
Sergeant at Mounted Unit since December 2023
Also served at 67th Precinct
Service started July 2011, made $137,000 last year, Tax #951422

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises

Lawsuit settlements:
$3,000   Watson-Dean, Michael Depriest vs City of New York, et al., 2018 EDNY EDNY 18CV06894
View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
7 Allegations
3 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Unable to Determine
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202302498, March 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202203585, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202302498, March 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Female, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force Female, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Female, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202203585, June 2022
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Watson-Dean, Michael Depriest vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 18CV06894, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 13, 2018, ended August 8, 2019
$3,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On September 5, 2016, plaintiff was shot in the arm and was subsequently in need of medical assistance. Defendant police officers instead arrested and handcuffed plaintiff without provocation or justification. Defendant officers did ultimately call an ambulance and transported plaintiff to the hospital where he remained handcuffed. Plaintiff was subsequently taken to the precinct, where he continued to request medical assistance. After another visit to the hospital, plaintiff was taken to central booking where the DA office declined to prosecute. Plaintiff was in custody for over 24 hours.