Daniel J. Fleischman

Daniel J. Fleischman

Daniel J. Fleischman
Badge #4269, White Male
Police Officer at Harbor Unit since March 2026
Also served at 104th Precinct
Service started April 2018, made $151,000 last year, Tax #965722

Complaints

4 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
3 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202411079, November 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202310600, October 2023
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Religion)
Complainant: Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202303359, April 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202001673, February 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202411079, November 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202310600, October 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 15-17 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Religion) Male, 15-17 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202303359, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202001673, February 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Black Male, 35 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.