Timothy Trainor

Former Deputy Chief at Deputy Commissioner of Public Information
Service started April 1991, ended February 2020, Tax #899922
White Male

Substantiated Allegations:
Discourtesy: Nasty Words

Lawsuit settlements:
$600,001   Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al, SDNY SDNY 10CV06005
View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
5 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Exonerated
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #9603912, July 1996
Allegation: Discourtesy: Nasty Words
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
additional details

Complaint #9601960, May 1996
Allegation: Force: Dragged/Pulled
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #9603912, July 1996
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Nasty Words Substantiated (Charges)
additional details
Complaint #9601960, May 1996
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Dragged/Pulled Unsubstantiated
Force: Push/Shove Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Exonerated
Discourtesy: Curse Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al
Case # 10CV06005, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
$600,001 Settlement
Second Amended Complaint
Description: Lawsuit against high ranking NYPD officials to silence, intimidate, threaten and retaliate against plaintiff for his documentation and disclosure of corruption with the NYPD. Specifically, that the NYPD had established an illegal quota policy for the issuance of summonses and arrests and that defendants were falsifying and instructing police officers to suborn perjury on police reports in order to distort COMPSTAT statistics. In order to prevent disclosure of these acts, defendants unlawfully entered plaintiff's home, had him forcibly removed in handcuffs, seized his personal effects, including evidence he had gathered documenting NYPD corruption and had him admitted to Jamaica Hospital Center against his will...