Conrade D. Joseph

Badge #16162, Black Male
Police Officer at 94th Precinct since May 2021
Service started November 2020, made $74,300 last year, Tax #969832

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Question
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Discourtesy: Word (5)
Offensive Language: Gender (2)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-28398
Closed: 8/25/2023

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
16 Allegations
10 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
7 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Unfounded
5 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202300864, January 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, June 1, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202200991, February 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Humiliation: fail to cover)
Complainant: White Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: White Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
Complainant: White Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: White Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: White Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: White Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Departure Letter
additional details

Complaint #202300864, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Offensive Language: Gender Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Offensive Language: Gender Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, June 1, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202200991, February 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Humiliation: fail to cover) White Female, 30-34 Unfounded
Force: Physical force White Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital White Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Handcuffs too tight White Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises White Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises White Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Question White Female, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Departure Letter
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-28398
Closed: 8/25/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully questioned an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: No disciplinary action